Here one day and gone the next. The
immigration issue was at the forefront in the Senate yesterday morning
until Senator Reid (D-NV) pulled it, to be debated again in late June.
Senator John McCain had time to speak some others and I before his
address to the Oklahoma State Legislature.
I had the pleasure of partaking in a conference call for major press
networks and blogger media persons with Senator John McCain yesterday.
Our topic was Government Efficiency, however I quickly learned that
McCain’s, what was suppose to be short and sweet, comments on the
immigration bill facing the Senate yesterday would carry the entire
questioning period.
I’ve stood silent on the Immigration issue this time. In fact, it’s
the first time. About a year ago when the nation’s largest cities were
holding mass organized protest, I counter protested and made state-wide
headlines in Dallas, Texas. My shirt read: “A day without Intruders…
sounds great!” I proudly waved the largest American flag in the middle
of a crowd that despised me. I endured the persecution of my so-called
peers for my views and this nation.
Needless to say, this is a topic that is on the forefront of our
minds and McCain stated that this issue in particular is the most
passionate issue of the Republican party. He later revised his comments
saying that “abortion may” have a greater passion.
You could hear the restlessness in the Senator’s voice. He is having
to defend a stance in which there are “increasing pressures” from
different sides. McCain was actually surprised by the skepticism of the
far right.
He was sure to touch on the topic of amnesty when saying, “this is
not amnesty…not…according to the definition.” He also quickly iterated
that “[we] are punishing families… a $5,000 fine, 8 years [waiting
period], and they must return to their country of origin.”
While McCain was calm, he sure seemed passively annoyed by the
questions that have already been answered. The highlight of the call was
when a reporter asked McCain to comment on Former Massachusetts
Governor and fellow Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney’s stance; “In the
case of Governor Romney, you know, maybe I should wait a couple of weeks
and see if it changes, because it’s changed in less than a year from
his position before…maybe his solution will be to get out his
small-varmint gun and drive those Guatemalans off his lawn.’’
McCain is known for his sometimes corny sense of humor, but I had to
join him on this one. This comment comes in reference to a piece in The
Boston Globe which pointed out that Romney had contracted a company to
do his lawn that employed illegals.
This mid day jab was quickly responded to by Kevin Madden, a
spokesman for Romney, “Governor Romney has been very clear that he
opposes this immigration agreement, which clearly falls short of the
American public’s expectations,’’ he went further to state, “It seems
that a certain candidate who brokered this flawed plan is having a very
difficult time coming to terms with the political fallout that has
ensued and has abandoned any and all substantive arguments for it.’’
Earlier in the conference call McCain also gave more insight into the
reports that say he used the “F” word targeting fellow Republican and
Immigration negotiator Senator John Cornyn (R-TX). He said the reports
were “a bit exaggerated,” but also stated that “we are very frank with
each other [at times].” Senator Cornyn’s office will not confirm that
the “F” word was used by Senator McCain.
McCain, having one of the strongest internet presences and strong
eCampaign backing, jokingly stated that he would “love to have YouTube”
in the closed door sessions; he thinks that it would give “insight” and
shed some light to the American public. He went further to state, “it
will surprise” and educate the people on how things are done and said.
I should point out that the Senator acknowledges that there is some
unsubstantiated disdain from the far left regarding this bill. He
believes that it is because of “personal dislike for this President” and
followed up by calling it, “irrational dislike.”
McCain pointed out that he is very close to the Hispanic leadership
in his home state of Arizona, where reportedly 50% of the illegal
crossings happen. He thinks this is an issue that will help his party
politically. He described the Hispanic people as, “small business, small
government, and pro life.” He was passionate when he articulated, “we
have to get” this issue out of the way. He believes there will be
“pressures” in support of this bill in the near future from Labor Unions
and the political Hispanic community.
While immigration was on the forefront of everyone’s tongue, I
carefully noted the following:
- McCain wished, yes I said: wished, that Fred Thompson was involved
in this debate; stating that Thompson too had changed his view (away
from support).
- McCain reiterated that we need to stay in Iraq, saying it will take
“patience and time….. unfortunately, time’s not on our side.”
- McCain’s entire purpose of the meeting might go missed by the
mainstream media, but not by this blogger. McCain told us that we need
to “clean up the corruption,” which he plans to lead. He also stated
what was the most overlooked line, “[I would] reform defense
acquisition.” Reference to Halliburton and Iraq contracts? Maybe the
‘maverick isn’t dead.’
This is an article written by Ali A. Akbar. Akbar is currently being
syndicated and writes for:
Blogs4McCain,
Razor Politics,
McCain Texas,
Ali A. Akbar & Friends, and his personal
temporary blog: Ali Talks. His editor can be contacted by clicking
here.
Resources:
Romney’s
Press Release
Fred
Thompson’s Article on National Review
Senator
John McCain’s Address to the Oklahoma State Legislature
Legislation
being Pulled to June
The
Boston Globe